to create and rate content, and to follow, bookmark, and share content with other members.
Question asked by
on Feb 13, 2007
on Feb 13, 2007 by olfu
Show 0 Likes
The insertion loss specifications of the 8169A Polarization Controller apply to the connectorless pigtail option. What performance can be expected with a connectorized version?
No one else has this question
Mark as assumed answered
This content has been marked as final.
Show 1 comment
(Required, will not be published)
Feb 13, 2007 12:55 AM
The difference from the specifications should just be the usual influence due to fiberoptic connector performance. The total insertion loss of the 8169A may typically increase by up to about 0.5dB due to the two connectors. Significant wavelength-dependent variation is not expected from the connectors unless the connection leaves a gap that causes interference oscillations in the transmission spectrum. The variation due to polarization rotation will be normally only influenced by the output connector and up to the PDL of the connector. This is normally very small. An open angled connector can contribute about 0.02dB PDL.
Show 0 Likes
Retrieving data ...
AEL in ADS 2012.08 (New User to AEL)
Dr. Joel time gating algoritm(post-gate renormalization)
8510 adapter removal & fixture S2P
Can not properly de-embed a evaluation board (Fixture)