In Circuit Test Systems
to create and rate content, and to follow, bookmark, and share content with other members.
3070 vs i1000 analog testing...
Question asked by
on Mar 4, 2015
on Mar 4, 2015 by recantu
Show 0 Likes
May i know which tester faster for pure analog board testing ? i1000 or 3070 and why ?
No one else has this question
Mark as assumed answered
This content has been marked as final.
Show 1 comment
(Required, will not be published)
Mar 4, 2015 3:05 PM
I don't actually have figures on both systems measurement times. I would say the i3070 is faster since the measurement and "judging" (pass/fail) of the tests are done on the 3070 module itself, independently from the computer, also, if you are using throughput multiplier every module is doing passive analog measurements at the same time. In other words is like having 4 small ICTs working together testing one board each. Throughput multiplier is designed to test boards in an homogeneous panels with node count < 1200.
If your applications comes in a panel, take a look to the throughput multiplier optio,n also the dual well shared wiring option can save you loading/unload time (some times called ping-pong fixture). Even the dual well option can theoretically be implemented on an i1000, it will require two presses to do so, something that with a vacuum fixture can be done pretty easily.
Show 0 Likes
Retrieving data ...
C deployment without I/O Libraries Installed
Where can find Labview about scope 86100C
Vee Pro 9.2 Ethernet Modbus/tcp
How do I save a DAT file when the Tracking Gen is on?