DSOX3024A I see spurs at 125MHz, 250, 500 etc on the FFT function. This occurs on all 4 channels, scope input impedance set at either 50 ohms or 1 Meg. Input BNC open or terminated either with a scope probe or 50 ohm terminator. It is about 20 dB above the noise level. It is also present at various span and center frequency settings. It does not appear to be external interference. Has anyone else noticed this?
I have added the screen shots and the scope setup data.
Edited by: KG4ARN on Apr 18, 2012 4:27 AM
Edited by: KG4ARN on Apr 18, 2012 4:33 AM
I have added the screen shots and the scope setup data.
Edited by: KG4ARN on Apr 18, 2012 4:27 AM
Edited by: KG4ARN on Apr 18, 2012 4:33 AM
Attachments
Based on what I see, they are very small. In the spur2 picture, for example, they appear to be at ~-60dBm, which is ~225uV rms. At 5mV/division, this would be invisible. I can't tell from your picture or setup what the vertical setting of the scope is, but it must be pretty small.
Al
Later this evening (Eastern Time), I can post some better tracings showing the spurs and how they appear with a signal on the scope.
I do not see this on my other digital scope (TEK TDS2022B) FFT function. I would like to know if you are seeing this on your scope or if anyone with an X3000 series can reproduce this or this is something peculiar to my scope.
Ed
I'm rolling out the door right now, so I don't have time for a full answer, but:
- I'm not seeing those spurs on my MSO-X 3054A. I see some very small ones, but they come and go
- I'm running V 2.00 firmware, what are you running?
- Please turn the channel on, so the settings can be seen, and add 2 measurements, Vpk-pk, and Vrms(AC)
Al
The firmware is 2.10 (Shipped with the scope)
The spur at 125 MHz is fairly steady in amplitude, the 250 MHz varies a lot, and 500 MHz is in between with regard to variation.
The spurs do not seem to be affected by the channel attenuation or the level of the input signal.
In the image sin_19_4 the WavGen output is turned off.
Attachments
Turn on the channel you are interested in. Set the vertical appropriately. Add the FFT. Add Vpk-pk and VRms on the channel. Make sure they show actual values.
While you're at it, add some markers to the FFT. Set Y1 to the approximate peak (I know that it varies) of the 125 MHz spike. Set Y2 to the approximate peak of the 375MHz spike.
BTW, which model of 3000 is this?
Al
(edited 24APR2012) I originally used the word "specification" which is incorrect. Agilent states that there are no (warranted or typical) specifications for this phenomenon.
I asked the engineer for permission to post his response to me, but he is not out of the office until Tuesday. I'll post it when I get permission. Thanks again for your help with this. Ed
Edited by: KG4ARN on Apr 24, 2012 5:35 AM
Please also note that I have edited my previous post to remove the word "specification" as this phenomenon is not an Agilent warranted or typical specified parameter.
Ed
*********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
Hello Ed,
Please allow me to introduce myself. I’m an applications engineer with Agilent Technologies. I support oscilloscopes and other digital solutions. I received your email.
First of all, thanks for contacting us directly.
In fact, this is normal. This is called “interleave spur.” In general, “fast” ADCs are built up of slower ADCs by interleaving them together. The benefit is faster ADCs, of course. The down side is that you end up with these spurs. Other technologies do exist, but the max sampling rate is currently lower, and the cost is higher.
I think you have seen that the peak level on the spurs (and FFT noise floor) change with the vertical setting on the channels. This is also normal. For each setting, however, what you will find is that there is about 50 dB of Spurious Free Dynamic Range (SFDR). To be clear, if you put in a signal that takes up most of the screen for a given vertical setting, the tallest spur will be about 50 dB down. The rest for the FFT noise floor will be even lower (~10 dB). Here are two screenshots that illustrate this:
Both screenshot same FFT settings and time scale; the markers are tracking the 1 MHz input and the first spur at 125 MHz. we want to look at the delta-Y results.
Input signal: 30 mV p-p sine wave at 1 MHz; vertical scale set to 5 mV/div (image002)
Input signal: 10V p-p sine wave at 1 MHz; vertical scale set to 2 V/div (image003)
To get more SFDR, a fundamentally different instrument is needed, such as a swept tuned spectrum analyzer. A oscilloscope, On the other hand, is a general purpose instrument… a jack of all (many) trades, master of some (timing measurements).
Hope that helps! Please let me know if you have further questions.
Regards,
Kevin Smith
Applications Engineer - Ask me about USB 3.0 compliance!
Test and Measurement Contact Center
Attachments
- The better (higher price, higher performance) the scope, the smaller the spurs
- It is possible to 'mask' this with a little math. There are scopes that don't show them at all. Some of them just use some notch filtering in the FFT to get rid of them. I saw one scope that didn't show them on screen, but if you extracted the data and ran your own FFT, they 'magically' reappeared.
- The issue is not how much they sit above the noise floor, but more importantly how much below the signal they are. The concept of SFDR (Spurious Free Dynamic Range) comes into play here.
- The level above the noise floor will vary, based on attenuation. As Willco788 saw, they may 'disappear' at low attenuation levels because the noise floor comes up enough to hide them.
- All of those spikes, and the noise in between, get integrated together and show up as RMS noise in the time domain. A given scope could have less total noise, but show some real spikes in the frequency. Scope designers try to avoid that, but it happens.
Have a great weekend!
Al