<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"><html><blockquote TYPE=CITE>And so the Jihad continues...................<p>How many of those passing comment on the VEE vs. LV issue have actually
built serious applications in both environments??
</blockquote>For 4 years I've been working with VEE. Once I built an application usingLabView on customer's demand. Maybe I can't call these applications "serious".But from the programmer's view I would always choose VEE. E.g., it's VERYtedious to look at program flow in LabView. Lots of frames have to be piledand only one can be seen at a time, one has to browse instead. VEE's objectswith sequence pins are so much clearer in my opinion.
I agree with all that has been said here before regarding the low effortsof Agilent to promote VEE. A good and versatile product that deserves tobe well-known - not at least to Agilent's honour? It certainly could contributeto sales figures. I hope some responsible person will finally recognisewhat a good product waits to be promoted much more actively.<p>André Lehmann
IOM GmbH
<a href="mailto:a-lehmann@iom-berlin.de">a-lehmann@iom-berlin.de</a></html>
built serious applications in both environments??
</blockquote>For 4 years I've been working with VEE. Once I built an application usingLabView on customer's demand. Maybe I can't call these applications "serious".But from the programmer's view I would always choose VEE. E.g., it's VERYtedious to look at program flow in LabView. Lots of frames have to be piledand only one can be seen at a time, one has to browse instead. VEE's objectswith sequence pins are so much clearer in my opinion.
I agree with all that has been said here before regarding the low effortsof Agilent to promote VEE. A good and versatile product that deserves tobe well-known - not at least to Agilent's honour? It certainly could contributeto sales figures. I hope some responsible person will finally recognisewhat a good product waits to be promoted much more actively.<p>André Lehmann
IOM GmbH
<a href="mailto:a-lehmann@iom-berlin.de">a-lehmann@iom-berlin.de</a></html>
, for VEE Next Revision. Pronounce it as
computer may be at risk. I believe it to be an HP 700 series HP-UX machine
sitting in a corner somewhere at the Loveland facility in air-conditioned
locked room. If something should happen to it, the VRF is dead. The
original keepers of the machine may be gone. We have too much invested to
lose this resource.
At a minimum, I believe someone should hold a master subscriber list which
is kept up-to-date in the event something happens. We may be forced to
another user group mechanism.
I believe this has been discussed in the past, and it should be discussed
again.
Does anyone have ideas?
I hope I'm not overreacting. If I am, please tell me.
George Tyrrell
TestDynamics LLC
Thornton, Colorado
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Groves" <Mike.Groves@ultrarf.com>
To: "VEE Reflector (E-mail)" <vrf@lvld.agilent.com>
Sent: May 23, 2002 5:08 PM
Subject: RE: vrf Future of VEE
> > I am truly thankful for the reflector responses, without the help of the
> > people here on this reflector I am sure that I would not have noticed
the
> > 6.1 update for some time.
>
> I assure you, I saw it purely by accident while looking for some other
info.
> I'm amazed as well that there have been no mailings, emailings, VRF
> emailings,
> etc. Maybe they were waiting for MTT to officially kick it off. I can't
say
> yet if it is even shipping or not.
>
> Well now I can. I just talked to an Agilent T&M sales person who told me
it
> WAS shipping. He couldn't say when it actually started to ship, he thinks
it
> was at least a couple of weeks ago. He saw some orders for it as early as
> April. How the heck anyone would know enough about it to place an order
for
> it is beyond me.
>
> Another thing I found amusing was he said it has a 3 week delivery
assigned
> to it. 3 weeks? For software?
>
> He assured me the T&M sales folks were caught off guard with this also
which
> we both agreed was not the norm for Agilent, even with previous versions
of
> VEE.
> His biggest problem now is to sort out the new pricing structure and have
> the
> answers ready for the questions that will surely start flowing in.
>
> Mike Groves
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the "vrf" maillist, managed by Majordomo. To send messages to
this maillist, just email to "vrf@lvld.agilent.com". Subscriptions and
unsubscriptions are done through the address "vrf-request@lvld.agilent.com".
If you need details, just send a message containing the text "help"
to "vrf-request@lvld.agilent.com".
---------------------------------------------------------------------