> I never expected the triadics would
> differ by two tenths of a second.
Man! Even on this clunker at a conservative 12 clicks per instruction that's
over 8 thousand instructions. Man! I've got entire programs that don't
compile out to 8000 instructions.
-SHAWN-
---
You are currently subscribed to vrf as: rsb@soco.agilent.com
To subscribe send a blank email to "join-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
To unsubscribe send a blank email to "leave-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
To send messages to this mailing list, email "vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
If you need help with the mailing list send a message to "owner-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
> differ by two tenths of a second.
Man! Even on this clunker at a conservative 12 clicks per instruction that's
over 8 thousand instructions. Man! I've got entire programs that don't
compile out to 8000 instructions.
-SHAWN-
---
You are currently subscribed to vrf as: rsb@soco.agilent.com
To subscribe send a blank email to "join-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
To unsubscribe send a blank email to "leave-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
To send messages to this mailing list, email "vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
If you need help with the mailing list send a message to "owner-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
> that you get problems with junctions.
Yes. We saw another example of this just before you joined. And a surprising
fix (at least I know I was shocked and awed).
> Is that right, that either all
> inputs have to be from type 'datas',
> else from type 'flow', but not a mixture.
I don't know what the official recommendation is, but I've found nothing but
problems when trying to control flow by using junctions. When I first
started using VEE, I tried to do a loop with a flow junction and it was a
total disaster. I guess in that respect sometimes VEE is *too* easy! It can
trick you into thinking you can do something you really can't.
If you'd like to post the function as an attachment we'll all suggest a
different method of solving your problem.
-SHAWN-
---
You are currently subscribed to vrf as: rsb@soco.agilent.com
To subscribe send a blank email to "join-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
To unsubscribe send a blank email to "leave-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
To send messages to this mailing list, email "vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
If you need help with the mailing list send a message to "owner-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
I am developing a cheap GPIB interface board to be used in dedicated
measurement setups providing digital I/O and dedicated additional functions,
e.g. such as stepper drive. ...
I implemented the identification code that can be retrieved using the
command *IDN?. I followed the guidelines found on the Agilent web site, i.e.
to have four fields separated by commas.
Although I can read the identification string using *IDN? and a subsequent
read command in VEE, the VEE instrument manager is not able to read the
proper device name when scanning the bus.
What is wrong?
Hans-Joachim Fischer
------------------------------------------
ESF GmbH
Brennerweg 7
D-89143 Blaubeuren
+49-7344-919693
+49-7344-919691 (fax)
+49-175-40 74 5 74 (GSM)
http://www.esf-gmbh.de
------------------------------------------
---
You are currently subscribed to vrf as: rsb@soco.agilent.com
To subscribe send a blank email to "join-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
To unsubscribe send a blank email to "leave-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
To send messages to this mailing list, email "vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
If you need help with the mailing list send a message to "owner-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
> multiple triadic statement because it
*SINGLE*, SingleTriadic dang it.
"Nurse, more coffee please..." -SHAWN-
---
You are currently subscribed to vrf as: rsb@soco.agilent.com
To subscribe send a blank email to "join-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
To unsubscribe send a blank email to "leave-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
To send messages to this mailing list, email "vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
If you need help with the mailing list send a message to "owner-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
Has anyone constructed spectrogram with Agilent VEE before ?
Does VEE have a built-in function for spectrogram ?
Please help, thank you.
Best regards,
Chris
_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
---
You are currently subscribed to vrf as: rsb@soco.agilent.com
To subscribe send a blank email to "join-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
To unsubscribe send a blank email to "leave-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
To send messages to this mailing list, email "vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
If you need help with the mailing list send a message to "owner-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
It's funny, because I use that kind of selection control all the
time. The array is stored in a record along with the index to the
array. For me, it makes certain parts a lot more readable.
I'm always amazed that there are some things in VEE you can do
umteen different ways, but there are other things I would love
to be able to do just ONE way, but can't very easily. (Of course
life is like that too!)
Cheers!
Mike Groves
-----Original Message-----
From: g.nied@gn-software.de [mailto:g.nied@gn-software.de]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 1:11 AM
To: VEE vrf
Subject: [vrf] RE: [VRF] junction
Mike, Shawn and others ...
I believe you all miss the obvious:
How about a single formula object with two rows:
_____________________
P1 | | Arr
P2 | Arr=[P1,P2,P3,P4]; | Result
P3 | Arr[E]; |
P4 | |
E |_____________________|
best regards,
G. Nied
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Georg Nied - Software-Development - Hansestr.7 - 51149 Cologne - Germany
Tel: +49 2203 9770915 - Fax: +49 2203 9770924 - eMail:info@gn-software.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [vrf] RE: [VRF] junction (08-Jul-2003 22:04)
From: mikegroves@pacbell.net
To: vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com
> Well, I played with this late last night and came up with 2 more ways
> it can be done. (Isn't VEE great?) One uses a single formula and the
> other uses the DeMultiplexer function. I also added function calls to
> all of them with timers. There's not much difference in the execution
> speeds, with a slight advantage going to the single triadic, so (like
> most things) it really comes down to personal preference.
>
> Mike Groves
---
You are currently subscribed to vrf as: rsb@soco.agilent.com
To subscribe send a blank email to "join-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
To unsubscribe send a blank email to "leave-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
To send messages to this mailing list, email "vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
If you need help with the mailing list send a message to "owner-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
I believe you all miss the obvious:
How about a single formula object with two rows:
_____________________
P1 | | Arr
P2 | Arr=[P1,P2,P3,P4]; | Result
P3 | Arr[E]; |
P4 | |
E |_____________________|
best regards,
G. Nied
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Georg Nied - Software-Development - Hansestr.7 - 51149 Cologne - Germany
Tel: +49 2203 9770915 - Fax: +49 2203 9770924 - eMail:info@gn-software.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [vrf] RE: [VRF] junction (08-Jul-2003 22:04)
From: mikegroves@pacbell.net
To: vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com
> Well, I played with this late last night and came up with 2 more ways
> it can be done. (Isn't VEE great?) One uses a single formula and the
> other uses the DeMultiplexer function. I also added function calls to
> all of them with timers. There's not much difference in the execution
> speeds, with a slight advantage going to the single triadic, so (like
> most things) it really comes down to personal preference.
>
> Mike Groves
---
You are currently subscribed to vrf as: rsb@soco.agilent.com
To subscribe send a blank email to "join-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
To unsubscribe send a blank email to "leave-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
To send messages to this mailing list, email "vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
If you need help with the mailing list send a message to "owner-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
> all of them with timers.
Thanks for that Mike. Man, those results are only going to encourage me to
write more cryptic stuff. I never expected the triadics would differ by two
tenths of a second. Um, well that's on this aging laptop anyway. Geez. I'm
going to be de-volving back to BASIC-like stuff here soon
-SHAWN-
---
You are currently subscribed to vrf as: rsb@soco.agilent.com
To subscribe send a blank email to "join-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
To unsubscribe send a blank email to "leave-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
To send messages to this mailing list, email "vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
If you need help with the mailing list send a message to "owner-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
Yup, I sure missed the obvious there! I guess that's why Georg gets the Big
Bucks
-----Original Message-----
From: g.nied@gn-software.de [mailto:g.nied@gn-software.de]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 3:11 AM
To: VEE vrf
Subject: [vrf] RE: [VRF] junction
Mike, Shawn and others ...
I believe you all miss the obvious:
How about a single formula object with two rows:
_____________________
P1 | | Arr
P2 | Arr=[P1,P2,P3,P4]; | Result
P3 | Arr[E]; |
P4 | |
E |_____________________|
best regards,
G. Nied
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Georg Nied - Software-Development - Hansestr.7 - 51149 Cologne - Germany
Tel: +49 2203 9770915 - Fax: +49 2203 9770924 - eMail:info@gn-software.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
You are currently subscribed to vrf as: rsb@soco.agilent.com
To subscribe send a blank email to "join-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
To unsubscribe send a blank email to "leave-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
To send messages to this mailing list, email "vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".
If you need help with the mailing list send a message to "owner-vrf@it.lists.it.agilent.com".