"Johannes Mulder" <JCM@eo.ie.philips.nl> wrote:
>
> > One observation though - I glanced thru the code and so far as I can tell
> > it does the same (or very similar) job as the Build Arb Waveform object.
> >
> The big difference is that the output array does not need to be
> equidistant (spelling OK?), and that is what I need. The resulting
> array needs to match exactly the given frequencies. I don't know an
> easy way to do this using any built-in function.
Aha! I missed that subtlety. You're right- waveforms in VEE are always
equal time increments.
So this could be considered a generalization of the Build Arb Waveform object.
again- thanks for sharing the source. Looks like a good addition to
my own customization package.
Stan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stan Bischof Hewlett Packard Company 707-577-3994 stanb@sr.hp.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > One observation though - I glanced thru the code and so far as I can tell
> > it does the same (or very similar) job as the Build Arb Waveform object.
> >
> The big difference is that the output array does not need to be
> equidistant (spelling OK?), and that is what I need. The resulting
> array needs to match exactly the given frequencies. I don't know an
> easy way to do this using any built-in function.
Aha! I missed that subtlety. You're right- waveforms in VEE are always
equal time increments.
So this could be considered a generalization of the Build Arb Waveform object.
again- thanks for sharing the source. Looks like a good addition to
my own customization package.
Stan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Stan Bischof Hewlett Packard Company 707-577-3994 stanb@sr.hp.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------