AnsweredAssumed Answered

Fw: VRF-VRF_Suffix

Question asked by VRFuser on May 6, 1998

I have to agree with matt.
----------
> From: Matthew Johnson <mrjohns2@uiuc.edu>
> To: hpvxd_xc@hpislsup.lvld.hp.com
> Subject: Re: VRF-VRF_Suffix
> Date: Thursday, May 07, 1998 12:03 PM
>
> Now since I am at least one who started this recent issue, I will
> comment to the group.
>
> For those of you who are filtering by subject and need the VRF, why not
> just filter by email address.  Somthing like if the from email address is
> blah, then filter.  That way, the subjects can stay normal.
>
> I guess my question is why can you not filter by from address and not
> use subject?  That way the sender does not have to do it, the admin does
> not have to do it, and you have to only make one change.
>
>
>
> matt
>
>
> On Thu, 7 May 1998, Greg Goebel wrote:
>
> > send q VRF-VRF_Suffix vrf
> >
> > from: Greg Goebel / HP-MXD
> >       gvg@lvld.hp.com / 800-452-4844
> >       website:  ftp://fcext3.external.hp.com/dist/mxd/index.html
> > to:   VRF
> > date: Thursday, 07 May 1998 1212 MDT
> >
> > Hi All:
> >
> > One of the little rules I suggested for the VRF is to prefix messages
to
> > the VRF with the suffix "VRF-". 
> >
> > Feedback I got on the issue indicated people thought it was a good
idea, and
> > certainly it was no great bother.  But I've been politely suggesting to
people
> > when they don't follow the custom that they do so, and getting flak
about it.
> >
> > So, may I ask:  who wants to keep on this custom, and who wants to drop
it?
> > I'm not so particular myself.
> >
> > As far as automating it, that's possible, but given sysadmin resources
> > (slender) and free time (slenderer) that's not a short-term option.
> >
> > Thanks for your time and consideration.
> >
> > [<>] regards -- gvg
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthew Johnson                      "In my mind and in my car
> finger <mrjohns2@uiuc.edu> for pgp key  we can't rewind we've
> <http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/mrjohns2/>  gone too far." -The Buggles

Outcomes