Stan Bischof wrote:
> Liek I said- weird. Apparently 4 was working despite a mis-configured
> EOL and 5 did the right thing and didn't work.
>
No, except in the general sense. It is not unknown forsomething that worked
in one revision of a software
product won't work in another ... and because a bug
was fixed, rather than added.
[<>] regards -- gvg
> Liek I said- weird. Apparently 4 was working despite a mis-configured
> EOL and 5 did the right thing and didn't work.
>
No, except in the general sense. It is not unknown forsomething that worked
in one revision of a software
product won't work in another ... and because a bug
was fixed, rather than added.
[<>] regards -- gvg